Saturday, December 15, 2012

Angry About Guns






I’m angry.

Another wacko has entered a “gun free” zone, this one filled with innocent children, and shot the place up, killing at least 26 people, including 20 kids.

To protect the kids, one teacher moved her students into a bathroom, bolted the door, and prayed.  I’m a huge advocate for prayer, but honestly, in this circumstance, I’d rather pray with a shotgun in my hand.

“Gun free zones” are inane.  Criminals don’t rules, so the only people who are “gun free” are the victims.  Will a gun always stop a nut from killing people?  No.  But it can offer a victim the means to defend his or herself, possibly deterring the criminal.

The knee jerk reaction to these types of tragedies is to blame the guns, gun owners, or the gun culture.  This hurts.  I’m part of the gun culture, but I certainly don’t kill kids.  My heart breaks when I hear about any killing, especially when kids are the victims.  Imagine how much harder it is to hear of such a tragedy, realizing you will be blamed.

The US has some of the least restrictive gun control laws in the world.  Many people blame these laws for the gun related violence in the US.  Truth is, there has never been a persuasive study showing a correlation between US gun violence and US gun laws or the proliferation of gun ownership.  In fact, there is a strong suggestion that such a correlation doesn’t exist.  States and cities with strong gun laws often see higher rates of gun crime than states and cities with less restrictive laws.  Foreign nations almost all have more restrictive laws, yet their rates of gun violence run the gambit from virtually none in countries such as Japan, Switzerland, and New Zealand, to extremely high rates in countries like Mexico, Brazil, and Russia.  The US does have a high rate of gun related violence, but, for a developed nation, we also have a high rate of incarceration and overall violence.

Some will claim that the US has seen more high profile shootings than other countries.  What they fail to observe, however, is that the US is not really comparable to Great Britain or Germany.  In the US, these countries would be states.  The US is best compared with Europe as a whole.  When considered this way, The US rate of mass shootings is about the same, even though Europe’s laws are much more restrictive.  Gross data is rarely relevant.  It has to be adjusted for contributing factors, then assessed for a correlation.  Without analysis using proper research technique, data is simply a political tool used to manipulate perception.  Most studies I’ve read on gun violence and the effects of gun control use “cherry picked” data to support a political agenda either for or against gun restriction.  John Lott, a highly regarded economist and former Yale professor, is the most reliable researcher I have found.  His analysis is precise, scientific, and unbiased.  In fact, he is a former gun control supporter who was converted through the analysis of his own research.  I strongly recommend reading his work.  (Note: Critics often try to discredit Lott because of his work with gun rights advocates, but this relationship started after his first publication on firearms statistics.)

I’m not necessarily opposed to gun laws.  I support an age requirement for gun ownership.  I believe violent felons should lose their rights to possess guns (not because they’ll comply, but because it provides a reason for arrest if they return to their violent ways).  If, however, we wish to add more restrictions to what is already the most regulated product in the US market, I believe these restrictions should be based on science rather than emotion.  Gun control advocates need to provide good data to support their proposals.  They’re the ones asking for freedom to be restricted.  They should provide the rationale.  So called “common sense” and emotional knee jerk reaction just doesn’t cut it.

Some References:


Multiple Victim Public Shootings: http://www.thevrwc.org/JohnLott.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Bookmark This Site

Eventually, I'd like to move this blog to it's own domain.